Thursday July 8, 2010 | 9 comments
Something has been bothering me ever since the World Tea Expo. It seems that just about every tea entrepreneur considering a brick-and-mortar tea shop is planning to open a cafe (including seating and some food). This is the default strategy for two reasons – cafes are a proven, profitable business model in the U.S. and this is what almost all customers SAY they want. So why is it that I am absolutely convinced that the customer is wrong? What hubris leads me to claim that customers don’t know what they really want?
I’ll dig into the business rationale for my departure from conventional wisdom in a moment, but first let me to attempt to redeem myself by association. Steve Jobs, the venerable CEO of Apple, often cites this quote from Henry Ford: “If I’d have asked customers what they wanted, they would have told me, ‘A faster horse!’”. Henry Ford envisioned an innovation that the customer didn’t realize was even possible. He created the Model-T automobile, the first “horseless carriage” that was mass-produced – and therefore within reach of the masses – and founded the Ford Motor Company.
Apple ignores its customers, ignores the critics, ignores the press, and ignores its own employees. New products are approved by Steve Jobs and a VERY small group of key employees with a vision for the future. On May 26 of this year, Apple became the largest technology company in the world, and the second largest company (after ExxonMobile) in the U.S. (by market capitalization). This from a company that was saved from bankruptcy in 1997 by a $150 million investment from Microsoft.
So back to tea. Customer thinking is derivative. It is based on the way they see tea today. According to conventional wisdom, a tea shop is a place where you sit and sip a cup of tea with a good friend and eat pastries or finger sandwiches. Or, if you’re a bit more progressive, a place where you sample fine loose-leaf teas and modern Asian-inspired health foods. But this has been done before! There are more than 25,000 cafes in the U.S. already, most of which serve tea and pastries. Innovation doesn’t happen in an echo chamber.
No one has cracked the code yet. No one has figured out how to inspire the rapid customer adoption that coffee saw when the number of coffee shops went from 1,650 in 1991 to 24,000 in 2006. Teavana has probably come the closest. They’re opening 800-square-foot stores with one register, selling over $1 million in product, and most likely delivering gross profits of a quarter million dollars annually. I’m not aware of anyone else who has come close to that level of efficiency and profitability in the U.S. How did Teavana do it? In part by ignoring the customer’s perception of what a tea shop should be and instead focusing on what it could be.
Yet, for all of Teavana’s financial success, they have yet to inspire the passionate customer loyalty that brands like Apple have managed to create and capitalize on. Teavana does a pretty good job introducing casual tea drinkers to loose-leaf teas, but my impression is that most customers don’t walk away from the shopping experience in love with tea or in love with Teavana. Moreover, the chat boards are strewn with Teavana customers scouring the Internet for new sources of tea.
I’ve spent five years in the trenches, and often behind the counter, of tea retail. I learned pretty quickly to ignore what customers are SAYING and focus instead on what drives their behavior. There is a BIG difference between what customers say they want and what actually prompts a purchase. The only people who are less honest than customers are friends and family. They’ll tell you that just about any idea you have is a good one and that you should “go for it”. Have you ever seen the early episodes of a season of American Idol? Most of those people were told by well-meaning friends and family that they could sing.
The moral of the story? Turn down the volume and start watching customer behavior. Look for opportunities for innovation. Look for the next big thing. There are opportunities all around us, but the next big thing is unlikely to be a carbon copy of something that already exists. An entrepreneur, by nature, thinks he/she can do it better. The successful ones also do something different!
For a little more on what I AM doing, read Developing the Retail Model and Store Design Part 3: Adagio’s Concept.

I would have to agree with you Charles. Innovation is where it’s at. You’re certainly wetting my whistle to see what Adagio has planned. When will your brick-and-mortar shop be opening……..she asked?
Our first shop should open on or shortly after September 1st. (http://www.tearetailer.com/article_61.html) The second should be a mall location opening in October.
When I saw the title, I knew Charles Cain was the author! :) I love reading your stuff because I feel my heart starting to beat a little faster..it has that bold, hungry, ‘I do want to crack the code’ feel to it. Well, Argo has done a pretty darn good job introducing loose leaf in a cafe format; isn’t their growth of stores at least as quick as Teavana’s was? And, someone may have cracked the code that you aren’t aware of! :) If someone does crack it, the knock-offs are right behind. I won’t mention names, but another beverage has proven the best product isn’t necessarily the winner in terms of success/growth. How often have any of us in the retail beverage business heard “I hate their stuff..it’s awful’ that go to that brand all the time because of one thing: Convenience. Yes, there is definitely a customer who will go out of their way for quality but, in the final analysis, the biggest companies in this retail food/beverage also have convenience and a branded feel. Put lipstick on the pig and put it where people can get it without leaving their car or their neighborhood and they will probably come.
Thanks for the kind words.:) Argo is an impressive operation. That said, they are a cafe, first and foremost. The majority of the tea they serve is either from concentrate (pre-brewed, concentrated tea re-constituted with hot water) and in the form of blended drinks. They also serve coffee. Loose leaf tea, and retail in general, is a side business for them – impulse buy items. At the end of the day, I don’t have anything bad to say about Argo, but most people looking to get into the “tea business” are not following companies like Argo, Peete’s Coffee and Tea or Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf. All will brew you a cup of loose leaf tea, and all have different themes and personalities, but none, IMHO, feed the soul of the tea connoisseur.
There is nothing wrong with opening a cafe. As I opened the piece, it is a proven, profitable business model. It’s also a crowded field… a “red ocean” as they say. I’m looking for blue waters. :)
Hi, Twittered about this string just now. Blue waters you say? Well, we are hidden in a suburb in So. Calif and are already hearing the name Teavana here. Blue meaning clear? There are no clear waters; there are sharks and red everywhere. Retailing loose leaf only in an ‘experiential’ environment with cupping, education, etc., isn’t a fresh, new concept; it’s been around. You can dress it up, make it branded feeling, etc… Argo didn’t always pre-brew by the way. And they do want to be perceived as a tea chain..with coffee as a minor. It’s being done all over Canada as well. Teaopia, David’s..there are so many variations on both cafe and no-cafe in tea. There is no red ocean on tea cafe retailing in a chain/branded fashion any more than non-cafe in this country, so far as I can tell. I can list only one recognizable tea cafe chain in the U.S. and that has limited recognizability in one area of one state with a few visitors from other states who are
spreading the word or even starting up in their area. Or have I missed one? Not Europe, the U.S. I know of one cafe ‘chain’ that still has just 2-3 stores after opening in the 1990′s. “Nothing new under the sun”. :)
Because no one has succeeded in differentiating themselves does not mean it cannot be done. I would agree that there are probably not many concepts out there that are truly revolutionary, but that doesn’t mean that there are not opportunities for brands or companies to be revolutionary. Apple didn’t reinvent the smart phone. There was nothing in the iPhone that didn’t exist in some other format previously. What Apple did was to package and brand a collection of software and design features that was so compelling that iPhone users don’t even consider the competition. Is Apple swimming in a red ocean or a blue ocean? Sure, there is strong competition in the smart-phone PDA market, but I’d say they did a pretty good job swimming out away from the pack. :)
Peete’s (and a lot of other cafe concepts) preceded Starbucks, and yet Starbucks managed to open something like 10,000 US locations in 15 years!!!! WalMart didn’t invent the discount store concept. In fact, Sam Walton was in retail for 20 years before opening the first WalMart. WalMart went from 38 stores selling just over $1 million each in 1970 to the world’s largest company with $165 billion in sales in 2000. Today they have annual sales over $400 billion and support more than 2 million employees. There wasn’t much new under the sun when it came to retail in 1970, but Sam Walton managed to catch lighting in a bottle. Granted he worked at it for 30 years before it was clear he had something special!!! :)
I don’t want to be Apple, Starbucks or WalMart, but I have no doubt that there are a lot of blue oceans in the tea business. I’ll close with a quote by Dory from Finding Nemo: “Just keep swimming. Just keep swimming… swimming… swimming…” lol
Nothing I disagree with here. I just think you tend to diss or at least disfavor the cafe concept in favor of the strictly retail (Argo vs Teavana) when, as you say above, any concept can be improved upon/updated/refigured to be something that truly stands out..whether cafe or just tea/GM. And both concepts can do education and experiential. Both concepts can become an extremely strong brand. Let’s end up with a store side by side and see what we have come up with and share like demographic, not write eachother out with exclusion clauses. :) But that’s another post.
Oh..just a trivia note. If I remember correctly, Sam Walton owned Ben Franklin stores. Remember them? No? He spent alot of time looking around in other people’s stores, including K-Mart, and he was constantly experimenting in his own stores. Distributors wanted nothing to do with him…too far out in the middle of nowhere to service him..so he shunned distributors once he got big. That’s why they ended up with their own distribution centers (or DC’s) and that’s what really differentiated his concept and helped him succeed/cutting out that middleman..that and technology..real-time information by store what was selling..he was an early adapter on using technology to get ahead of the pack. Doggone it Charles…we need to tawk, man!!
Clarify..I think he owned two Ben Franks..not the chain. Goodnight…